 |
Review:
The Chemical and Biological Medical Treatment
Symposium - Middle East I Science and Medicine
Building Bridges
Cairo, Egypt, 7 -11 December 1997
by Barbara Price, Co-chair
Summary of Sessions
|
The CBMTS Middle East
I brought together over 115 scientists from 31
countries to discuss chemical poisoning and
biological infections and diseases and their
treatment, highlighting the Middle East
perspective. Previous CBMTSs had been held in
Europe and this was the first effort at a
regional perspective.
Some of the technical talks emphasized the
agricultural and pesticide workers and their
environment. From these we developed an
appreciation of the effects dust levels in the
Middle East, the prevalence of hepatitis,
bilharzia, and other conditions endemic to the
Middle East. It became apparent that typical
clinical measures of intoxication, such as
profiling liver and pulmonary functions, were of
limited usefulness. These could also be very
different when compared to typical European or
American populations. Both conditions reminded
the attendees of the importance of both baseline
measurements and monitoring that could be more
unique and specific to the particular toxic
chemicals.
Most papers dealt with different manifestations
of intoxication and fewer dealt with their
treatment. Several papers discussed monitoring
methods that could be extrapolated to measure or
predict human intoxication. The use of brine
shrimp as a general toxicity measure has been
correlated with over 43 different chemicals.
Cultured pulmonary cells can be used to relate
exposure to pulmonary toxicants. Several papers
discussed various clinical measures of
intoxication, including detailed discussions of
cholinesterase measurements. It is apparent from
the wide range of manifestations studied that
there are no agreed standards for measuring
intoxications in general. Even among chemicals
with similar initial modes of attack, i.e., OPs
and carbamates, there are questions as to the
appropriate monitors. We were reminded that while
BuChE measurements with the less toxic
insecticides may give us a measure of the
intoxication, the utility of same measurement
with chemical warfare agents was dubious because
other clinical manifestations were more
sensitive.
Of particular interest to most ASA readers were
the papers dealing with chemical warfare agents.
Although the study of health of OP pesticide
workers has direct correlation with OPs used as
chemical weapons, there are enough differences in
clinical symptoms and conventional means of
assessing the level of intoxication to hinder the
exchange of information, unless the scientists
and medical doctors could personally compare
notes and discuss approaches. And this was one of
the very useful and practical outcomes of this
CBMTS. Many of the Middle East participants
expressed their thanks for a symposium that
brought scientists and doctors from the
international community to their region for
detailed discussions.
With regard to OPs, one session chair offered
these recommendations for continued work in the
area : |
1. Undertake more studies on the
pathophysiology of OP poisoning and expand
such studies to cover all internal organs.
2. It is essential to follow up patients
exposed to OPs and determine the
reversibility of the damages produced.
3. It is essential to look at the regulation
of OP usage, as well as training the user on
the proper usage and to initiate health
educations programs on the dangers of OP.
4. Further studies should be initiated aimed
at the use of drugs to attack various points
in the biochemical and physiological chain
reactions caused by OPs.
5. More studies should be conducted to
investigate OP effect on fetal development
and possible fetal damage.
6. There is a definite need to look in
details into the metabolism and excretion of
toxic chemicals in order to determine the
best way to counteract their toxic effects
|
A pair of
presentations from Kuwait provided a vividly
illustrated account of the environmental
catastrophe and human suffering caused during the
Iraqi occupation of Kuwait. The many questions,
comments, and expressions of sympathy and
appreciation showed the extent to which this
audience is concerned that our efforts, in the
end, are aimed at improving human life. These
final talks also illustrated the important
requirement for cooperation between military
medical personnel and civilian medical and
epidemiological experts to document and quantify
the health impact of conflict. Data being
collected in Kuwait show measurable health
effects, which can be related to a range of
factors, including oil fire pollution,
psychological/social disruption, disruption of
health services, and trauma (e.g., from land
mines). Effects are shown not only in specific
disease patterns, but also in broader measures
such as life expectancy.
In the biological area, the two papers from
Vector addressed the need for improved diagnostic
tests for Ebola virus and the involvement of the
immune system in Ebola and Marburg infections
(see also ASA 97-6). A third paper from Egypt
discussed how the use of PCR diagnostic markers
for hepatitis B, used in a general study of
hospital patients, indicated an amazing 20
percent of
the general population was infected, albeit at
levels below any clinical manifestations.
Biological toxins from various plants and animals
have been considered threat agents. Some of these
will be controlled under the CWC and even more
under the BTWC. An excellent presentation gave a
balance between the good and bad of toxins,
emphasizing their utility as specific molecular
probes and as drugs to relieve or ameliorate
symptoms of a large variety of diseases. Rather
than restrict or eliminate research programs,
researchers in the field were encouraged to
develop detection techniques along with their
other research programs.98-1, issue no. 64
|
| For the
Professional in Government and Industry with an
interest in Nuclear, Biological and Chemical
Defense, Disarmament and Verification; Emergency
and Disaster Medical Planning; Industrial Health
and Safety; and Environmental Protection |
|
|